100 Novels: When It Comes to Getting Sideways, the Movie Makes the Book Palatable


Sideways
By Rex Pickett
St. Martin’s Griffin, 2004

Adapting a novel to the screen has to be a daunting task. If you take Spike Jonze’s brilliant, quirky and genuinely bizarre movie Adaptation as a guide, adapting any book to the screen — in this case Susan Orlean’s nonfiction book The Orchid Thief — is a harrowing, freaky ride.

Screenwriters must condense hundreds of pages into a visual experience that doesn’t exceed the limits of the human bladder. In doing so they risk alienating fans of the book, potentially ruining both book and movie for readers and audiences alike. Screenwriters either follow the book too closely, or they diverge so far from it, they create a new, and sometimes, unrecognizable creature.

At times, however, the adaptation goes so well a work of art gets created, something that equals, or succeeds the original piece. I’m thinking of the marvelous adaptations to the screen of No Country for Old Men and Brokeback Mountain.

Often, though, the adaptation falls short and you exit the theater, or switch off the DVD player, saying, “The book was waaaaaaaay better.” In the case of Rex Pickett’s novel Sideways, the movie adaptation doesn’t fall short at all; it turns out waaaaaaaay better than the novel.

Both the book and the movie tell the story of Miles and Jack, two buddies embarking on a madcap, weeklong wine tasting adventure into California’s Santa Ynez Valley — the last bachelor hurrah for Jack getting married at the end of the week. The mismatched pair — Miles, the lonesome loser; Jack, the good-times man everybody loves — fling themselves into wine, women and the emergency room, testing love and friendship along the way.

Essentially the book and movie are similar enough that readers won’t blow out head-scratching “huhs?” with the changes screenwriters adapted to the plot. Jack and Miles are recognizable, the plot itself, though reshaped significantly for better dramatic effect in some spots, is recognizable. What clicks in the movie and not in the book are the changes in plot that make the story itself much more plausible and less contrived than in Pickett’s novel.

The novel starts out well, opening with a frantic Miles trying to pack for the road trip, a scene that establishes Miles’s character and circumstances — he’s broke (a detriment to his oenophilia) and is taking an extravagant trip he can’t afford; and he’s banking on a last-ditch effort to publish a novel. The opening’s also well paced, getting the characters on the road, after a hilarious wine tasting episode not in the film, and establishing the characters’ motives — Miles wants to escape his dreary life, enjoy a lot of wine, and send his friend off with a bang, while Jack wants a bang or two, along with his quaff.

The novel falters, however, with several contrived plot points. There is, for instance, a strange and ludicrous boar hunt with local yokel Brad that seems pointless, other than to provide Jack with broken ribs — one of a series of injuries Jack will have to explain away to his fiancee — and a gun, for a later, overly-violent encounter with Jack’s betrayed girlfriend for the week, Terra.

And Pickett seems to think it’s implausible that Miles’s love interest Maya may actually be attracted to Miles. Disturbingly, Pickett has Jack pimp out Maya for no good reason, other than to alienate Miles, Jack and Maya, a brief alienation that gets tidied up all too well at the end of the novel when Miles and Maya trip merrily off into the sunset. The film, on the other hand, ends with Miles standing in the rain outside of Maya’s apartment — he’s betrayed her by lying about Jack’s marriage — leaving the audience and Miles wondering if Maya will answer the door.

The novel, however, isn’t horrible. There are insightful moments when Miles contemplates the nature of friendships and love. There are clearly well researched scenes about wine and wine tasting. And Pickett certainly depicst a hangover well. But, in the end, the movie cleans up the novel’s loose ends, and makes for a more satisfying experience, a good quaff, slightly fruity, with no bitter residue.

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “100 Novels: When It Comes to Getting Sideways, the Movie Makes the Book Palatable

  1. Pingback: Booking Through Thursday: Movies and books « Exile on Ninth Street

  2. I truly liked your short, simple, but lucid expose on why the movie “Sideways” is superior to the book. The movie dresses down the characters Miles and Jack and Myra to that degree into much more plausiable and definitive characters. Here are a few more thoughts:
    1) The books, because it has the luxury of significantly more prose, goes into way too much detail about the wine tasting experience and its fundamentals. The movie really uses the wine tasting experience as pretty much a framework to hang the more significant story-theme of the movie. That theme is that Jack for all of his rough, heidionist ways is really responsibe for saving Miles life, both figuratively and almost literally. Miles is a psychological mess. Jack by forcefully greasing the connection between Miles and Myra, saves Miles from himself. Miles is on a downward slope and Jack brings him back from the emotional brink.

    2) As you alluded to in your article, the destruction to Jack’s body makes much more sense in the movie than the contrived storyline of the book. In the movie, Jack becomes seriously injured in one clean and easily explanable process. The book requires three steps…which is two too many.

    3) Myra’s character in the movie makes significantly much more sense. In the book, she appears as a thoughtful food server with little more substance than here strong knowledge of wine. In the movie, she is a near academic, thoughtful but fun character who has the intellectual wherewithall of seeing the deeper complexity of Mile’s character.

    4) I think you missed the point of the final scene in the movie. There is not a question on whether Myra will open up the door. What we need to know and is strongly suggested is whether Miles is a changed person? And, yes he is! After he hears Myra’s message on his phone, he doesn’t wait around for another invitation-this time he seizes the bull by the horns and heads up to see her. See Jack was able to significantly help him in that direction, but finally, Miles is ready to take charge of his life. He just may not end up being the diffident, scared, over-analyzing looser that we met at the beginning of the movie. HIs future definitely shows promise.

    Well there you go-a few thoughts.

  3. Pingback: The Martian: A review | Exile on Ninth Street

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s